Contractual resale right under § 1071 ABGB: buyer option, unwinding, limits, purchase-price accounting and land-register completion.
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Salzburg law firm for real estate, property and corporate law
Every matter is handled by a coordinated team of lawyers, legal staff and specialists. In property purchase matters we look at the contract, land register, escrow and tax consequences together.
A contractual resale right gives the buyer the possibility of selling the purchased property back to the seller at a later point. In practice, this legal concept is easily confused with the seller repurchase right or with a right of first refusal.
§ 1071 ABGB provides that the resale right agreed by the buyer is subject to the same restrictions as a repurchase. The rules in §§ 1068 to 1070 ABGB therefore provide the statutory framework. The exact contract remains decisive for the property, conditions and accounting.
This post explains which points should be checked before the clause is agreed and before the right is exercised. The focus is on the buyer option, unwinding, land-register completion and the distinction from related legal concepts.
Answer questions about your role, the clause and land-register completion. You receive an initial orientation for the next review step.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
A resale right of the buyer has to be assessed differently from a repurchase right of the seller or a right of first refusal.
If the seller should be able to reacquire the property, the issue is generally a repurchase right. This has to be distinguished from the buyer right under § 1071 ABGB. Check the exact wording and the registration position before making a declaration.
A legal review can separate the legal concepts and their consequences.
Without the complete contract it is not possible to determine reliably whether the parties agreed a resale right, a repurchase right or a right of first refusal. Also secure schedules, amendments, payment records and the current land-register extract.
Exercise or transfer back should follow only after this material is assembled.
An unclear clause leaves open which property is covered, when the right can be exercised and how the purchase price, use and improvements are accounted for. These points should be agreed specifically before signing.
Do not rely on the heading resale right as a substitute for the operative wording.
Exercising the resale right does not answer every question about the transfer back. For property, purchase-price accounting, handover, the required documents and the registration under § 431 ABGB have to match.
Clarify the order of completion before money or possession is finally transferred.
If the clause, accounting and completion documents match, the transfer back is better prepared. Still check the condition of the property, improvements, extraordinary costs and the exact land-register implementation.
An individual review remains sensible before the option is exercised.
§ 1071 ABGB deals with the situation in which the buyer and seller agree on a right to resell the thing at a later point. The provision refers this right to the rules on repurchase. The clause therefore has a statutory framework that goes beyond its heading.
For contract review this means that the contract should identify the property, the trigger for exercise, the declaration, the consideration and the steps of unwinding as precisely as possible. A heading such as resale right does not answer these questions.
The wording of § 1071 ABGB in RIS also contains an important warning. If a resale is merely used to conceal a pledge or a loan transaction, the provision refers to § 916 ABGB. Whether that applies depends on the agreement and its economic function in the individual case.
For repurchase, § 1070 ABGB provides that the right exists only for immovable things and belongs to the seller only for the seller’s lifetime. Under § 1071 ABGB the buyer resale right is subject to the same restrictions. A property clause must therefore be checked against this statutory framework.
§ 1070 ABGB also provides that the right cannot be transferred to heirs or to another person. The personal allocation of the right must not be assumed without checking it. Contractual additions concerning duration, exercise or succession require particular care.
If the right is registered in the public books, § 1070 ABGB provides that the thing may also be demanded from a third party. Contract review should therefore identify the registration and clarify what effect it is intended to have for the planned transfer back.
§ 1068 ABGB describes the basic consequence where a repurchase right was granted without further specification. The thing has to be returned in a condition that is not worsened. In return, the purchase price paid is returned. The benefits drawn from the money and from the thing in the meantime are generally set off against each other.
The clause should therefore state how the price is determined and which payments are included. Possession, use, income and the date of return should also be clarified. A flat repayment can create a dispute if the property was used or changed in the meantime.
§ 1069 ABGB addresses improvements and extraordinary preservation costs. If the buyer improved the thing with personal funds or incurred extraordinary costs for its preservation, the buyer is generally entitled to compensation as a bona fide possessor. Liability can arise for culpable changes in value or for frustrating the return.
Exercise of the resale right clarifies the contractual unwinding. For property it does not replace the transfer of ownership by registration. § 431 ABGB provides that an acquisition transaction concerning an immovable thing has to be entered in the designated public books.
Completion therefore requires the contract, the declaration of exercise, the required certified documents and the land-register application to match. The wording of § 431 ABGB in RIS describes this connection through registration.
The order should be fixed in advance: Which declaration triggers unwinding? When are possession and keys returned? Which payments are accounted for? Who submits the land-register application? Related completion risks are shown in our posts on the expiring priority notice and escrow and on renovation before registration.
Under § 1071 ABGB the buyer should be able to resell the thing to the seller. Under §§ 1068 to 1070 ABGB the seller has the right to redeem the thing sold. The direction of the right is therefore a central distinction.
A right of first refusal concerns a different situation. It gives a beneficiary priority when the owner plans to sell to a third party. It therefore follows a different exercise mechanism from the buyer option to resell to the original seller. The details are explained in the post on the right of first refusal when buying property.
Before making a declaration, compare the complete contract with the land-register extract. Only then can it be assessed which legal concept was agreed, whether its limits are respected and which steps are required for a transfer back.
The direction of the right and the event triggering its exercise determine the next review.
| Legal concept | Who acts? | Review focus |
|---|---|---|
| Resale right Buyer right under § 1071 ABGB | Buyer offers the property back to the seller | Clause, unwinding and land-register completion |
| Repurchase right Seller right under §§ 1068 to 1070 ABGB | Seller redeems the property | Statutory limits, registration and condition of the thing |
| First refusal right Priority of a beneficiary | Beneficiary responds to a sale to a third party | Notice of the sale case and separate exercise conditions |
The label in the contract is not enough. The wording, economic function, land-register position and actual sequence are decisive.
Before exercise: First identify the legal concept and review the complete contract wording. For property, return, purchase-price accounting and registration have to fit together.
It is a right agreed by the buyer to sell the purchased thing back to the seller at a later point. § 1071 ABGB refers this right to the provisions on repurchase.
No. With a resale right the buyer takes the initiative. With a repurchase right the seller has the right to redeem the thing. The exact clause has to be reviewed.
§ 1070 ABGB limits repurchase to immovable things. Under § 1071 ABGB the buyer right is subject to the same restrictions. For property, the specific agreement must also be checked against those limits.
Under § 1068 ABGB the purchase price paid is returned where no more specific arrangement was made. Benefits are generally set off against each other. Improvements, extraordinary costs and culpable changes can affect the accounting.
The declaration alone does not replace completion in the land register. Under § 431 ABGB the acquisition transaction for an immovable thing has to be entered in the public books. The contract and completion documents should therefore match.
Land-register priority and secure completion for time-sensitive registrations.
Contractual rules for renovation, handover and unwinding.
Distinguishing first refusal from other rights to reacquire property.
Review the complete property purchase contract before signing.
When buying property, the contract and the land register decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000